The European Court of Justice ́s case law and its importance as a source of law
Research project
How has case law-based EU-law developed and how is it structured? How should we understand the European Court of Justice's judgments as a source of law?
The project examines how the European Court of Justice (ECJ) case law serves as a key source of EU law. Unlike national legal systems, EU law is largely shaped through ECJ judgments, but little is known about how it creates case law. Traditional methods are poorly suited to identify patterns in the ECJ’s vast case law. The project uses network and statistical analysis to (1) group judgments, (2) identify key rulings, (3) study citation effects, (4) explain citation choices, (5) trace historical development, (6) detect early changes, and (7) identify citation preferences of judges.
The projects seeks to examine how the European Court of Justice ́s (ECJ) case law is important as a source of law. Unlike most national legal systems in Europe, the law of the European Union can be found in and is developed through court judgments, most importantly the case law of the ECJ.
Several areas of EU law has been developed by the ECJ adjudicating individual cases and then expanding upon those cases in future cases. Despite its central importance in Europe, very little is known about how the Court creates its case law. The primary reason for this lack of knowledge is that the legal methods traditionally used to examine the Court ́s decisions are poorly suited for identifying patterns in the vast material that is the case law (ca 9 000 judgments).
The project shall analyze research in network analysis and statistical analysis capable of identifying such patterns in the case law from a legal perspective.
Through its different parts the project will (1) compare and evaluate various methods for grouping ECJ judgments together; (2) analyze and compare the different methods for identifying the ECJ?s most important judgments; (3) determine if citation choices affects the outcome of a case; (4) explain what guides citation choices; (5) describe and explain the historical development of the ECJ?s case law; (6) develop a model capable of detecting changes in the ECJ?s case law at an early stage; and (7) identify citation preferences of different ECJ judges.
Publications:
Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, The Court of Justice and the Ankara Agreement: Exploring the Empirical Approach, Europarättslig Tidskrift 2012 (3) pp. 462–481 (availble through SSRN)
Mattias Derlén, Johan Lindholm, Martin Rosvall & Atieh Mirshahvalad, Coherence Out of Chaos: Mapping European Union Law by Running Randomly Through the Maze of CJEU Case Law, Europarättslig Tidskrift 2013 (3) pp. 517–535 (available through SSRN)
Atieh Mirshahvalad, Johan Lindholm, Mattias Derlén & Martin Rosvall, Significant Communities in Large Sparse Networks, PLoS ONE, 7(3):e33721 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033721
Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, Goodbye van Gend en Loos, Hello Bosman? Using Network Analysis to Measure the Importance of Individual CJEU Judgments, European Law Journal vol. 20 (5) pp. 667–687 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12077
Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, Characteristics of Precedent: The Case Law of the European Court of Justice in Three Dimensions, German Law Journal vol. 16 (5) pp. 1073–1098 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021040
Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, Peek-a-Boo, It’s a Case-Law System! Comparing the European Court of Justice and the United States Supreme Court from a Network Perspective, German Law Journal vol. 18 (3) pp. 647–686 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022100
Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, Is it Good Law? Network Analysis and the CJEU’s Internal Market Jurisprudence, Journal of International Economic Law vol. 20 (2) pp. 257–277 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgx011