Swedish name: Metodspecialisering i Landskapsarkeologi
This syllabus is valid: 2022-06-20 and until further notice
Syllabus for courses starting after 2022-06-20
Course code: 1AR084
Credit points: 15
Education level: Second cycle
Main Field of Study and progress level:
Landscape Archaeology: Second cycle, has second-cycle course/s as entry requirements
Grading scale: Pass with distinction, Pass, Fail
Responsible department: Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies
Revised by: Head of Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, 2022-02-15
The course deals with key themes in landscape archaeology. We study approaches to, for example, in situ preservation in urban and rural wetland environments, the history of land use, ancient landscape changes, changes in human-landscape interaction, palimpsest landscapes, ritual landscapes, etc. Each theme illustrates how landscape archaeologists try to understand human actions throughout history. In some parts, the approach is science-oriented. In other parts, with ritual perspectives, the approach is post-procedural. The course is examined as two blocks of 7.5 credits each.
After finishing the course, the student should be able to:
Knowledge and Understanding:
Skills and Abilities:
Judgement and Approach:
Univ: Bachelor's degree and 60 credits courses at advanced level in landscape archeology, or equivalent.
This is a classroom-based course. The course material is provided extensively through our web platform. The course combines lectures, seminars and discussion sessions. The lectures provide a wide range of examples within the themes of the course. The lectures offer a necessary basis for further studies to develop knowledge and understanding of each theme. Through the preparation of short presentations linked to specific aspects of the study subject, the seminars contribute to developing an in-depth understanding of each theme.
Examination takes the form of oral and practical presentations in the classroom and active oral seminar participation in groups, as well as two written assignments.
Part 1 (7.5 credits): Seminar participation with oral and practical assignment and written assignment. The written assignment is a critically reviewing case study based on a seminar theme. For the written assignment, one of the grades Fail (U), Pass (G) or Pass (VG) is given.
Part 2 (7.5 credits): Seminar participation with oral and practical assignment and written assignment. The written assignment is an essay that explores a key theme in more detail. For this task, the student is expected to demonstrate an in-depth understanding of their chosen theme, as demonstrated by the breadth of literature used to support argumentation and through a detailed and knowledgeable analysis of the subject, while demonstrating a critical and thoughtful approach to the subject. On the written assignment, one of the grades Fail (U), Pass (G) or Pass with Distinction (VG) is given.
In order to pass each module, all examination elements must be at least approved. For the module grade VG (Pass with Distinction) for each module, one must get a VG rating for the written assignment. Criteria and documentation methods for assessing individual tasks are presented by the examiner at the beginning of the course.
As the final grade of the course, one of the grades VG (Pass with Distinction), G (Pass) or U (Fail) is given. To pass the course, both course modules must at least be assessed as G. For the grade VG on the entire course, one must also get a VG rating for both modules.
At master's level, the student is expected to demonstrate critical thinking, analytical skills and social interaction skills that are consistent with what can be expected at the advanced level. The ability to work independently and to be active in all course areas is fundamental to the learning environment
Students who have passed may not undergo further examination for higher grades. For those students who have not been approved at the regular examination opportunity, a re-examination is arranged within two months after the ordinary examination opportunity, and another within one-year, so-called collection examination.
Students who have twice failed an examination for a course or part of a course have the right at the next re-examination opportunity to request from the head of education at the Faculty of Humanities that a new examiner be appointed for future re-examinations unless there are special reasons to the contrary.
Deviations from the syllabus' examination form can be made for a student who has a decision on pedagogical support due to a disability. Individual adaptation of the examination form must be considered based on the student's needs. The examination form is adapted within the framework of the syllabus' expected study results. At the request of the student, the course teacher in consultation, in consultation with the examiner, shall promptly decide on an adapted form of examination. The decision must then be notified to the student.
In the event that the syllabus expires or undergoes major changes, students are guaranteed at least three exams (including regular exams) according to the regulations in the syllabus on which the student was originally registered for a period of a maximum of two years from the previous syllabus expires or the course has been discontinued.