PublicationsReports are available in Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Publications pages. If you need to download a copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader, which will enable you to read print the reports, press the icon below.
Press here for information on Acrobat Reader®
EM No 63. Notes from the Twelfth International SweSAT Conference. Umeå, June 15–17, 2008. Christina Stage
EM No 61. Systematic Equating Error with Randomly-Equivalent Groups Design.
An Examination of the Equal Ability Distribution Assumption.
Per-Erik Lyrén, Ronald K. Hambleton
EM No 58. Notes From the Eleventh International SweSAT Conference. Umeå, June 12-14, 2006. Christina Stage
EM No 56. Validity issues concerning repeated test taking of the SweSAT.
Birgitta Törnkvist, Widar Henriksson
EM No 52. Notes From the Tenth International SweSAT Conference. Umeå, June 1-3, 2004. Christina Stage
EM No 51. Entrance to Higher Education in Sweden. Christina Stage
EM No 49. The Swedish Scholastic Assessment Test (SweSAT). Development, Results and Experiences. Christina Stage, Gunilla Ögren
EM No 47. Repeated Test Taking. Differences Beteen Social Groups. Birgitta Törnkvist, Widar Henriksson.
EM No 46. SweSAT Repeat. Birgitta Törnkvist, Widar Henriksson.
EM No 42. Classical Test Theory or Item Response Theory: The Swedish Experience. Christina Stage
EM No 41. The effects of repeated test taking in relation to test taker and the rules för selection to higher education in Sweden. Widar Henriksson, Birgitta Törnkvist.
EM No 40. Notes from ninth international SweSAT conference Umeå, June 4-6, 2001. Christina Stage
EM No 35. Notes From The Seventh International Swe-SAT Conference Umeå, June 3-5, 1999. Christina Stage
EM No 34. Predicting Gender Differences in WORD Items. A Comparison of item Response Theory and Classical Test Theory. Christina Stage
EM No 33. A Comparison Between Item Analysis Based on Item Response Theory and on Classical Test Theory. A Study of the SweSAT Subtest READ. Christina Stage
EM No 32. NONEQUIVALENT GROUPS IRT OBSERVED SCORE EQUATING. Its Applicability and Appropriateness for the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test. Wilco H.M. Emons
EM No 31. NOTES FROM THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SWESAT CONFERENCE. San Diego, April 12, 1998. Christina Stage
EM No 30. A Comparison Between Item Analysis Based on Item Response Theory and on Classical Test Theory. A Study of the SweSAT Subtest ERC. Christina Stage
EM No 29. A Comparison Between Item Analysis Based on Item Response Theory and on Classical Test Theory. A Study of the SweSAT Subtest WORD. Christina Stage
EM No 28. NOTES FROM THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SWESAT CONFERENCE. Umeå, May 31–June 2, 1997. Christina Stage
EM No 27. DIFFENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING (DIF) IN RELATION TO ITEM CONTENT. A study of three subtests in the SweSAT with focus on gender. Anita Wester
EM No 26. THE APPLICABILITY OF ITEM RESPONSE MODELS TO THE SweSAT. A Study of the WORD Subtest
Christina Stage
EM No 25. THE APPLICABILITY OF ITEM RESPONSE MODELS TO THE SweSAT. A Study of the READ Subtest
Christina Stage
EM No 24. THE APPLICABILITY OF ITEM RESPONSE MODELS TO THE SweSAT. A Study of the ERC Subtest
Christina Stage
EM No 23. DO MALES AND FEMALES WITH IDENTICAL TEST SCORES SOLVE TEST ITEMS IN THE SAME WAY?
Christina Stage
EM No 21. THE APPLICABILITY OF ITEM RESPONSE MODELS TO THE SWESAT. A study of the DTM subtest
Christina Stage
EM No 19. AN ATTEMPT TO FIT IRT MODELS TO THE DS SUBTEST IN THE SweSAT
Christina Stage
EM No 20. NOTES FROM THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SweSAT CONFERENCE. New York, April 7, 1996
Christina Stage
EM No 13. REPEATED TEST TAKING AND THE SweSAT
Widar Henriksson
EM No 14. AMBITIONS AND ATTITUDES TOWARD STUDIES AND STUDY RESULTS. Interviews with students of the Business Administration study program in Umeå, Sweden
Anita Wester
EM No 15. EXPERIENCES WITH THE SWEDISH SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST.
Christina Stage
EM No 16. NOTES FROM THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL SweSAT CONFEREN CE. Umeå May 27-30, 1995
Christina Stage, Widar Henriksson
EM No 17. THE COMPLEXITY OF DATA SUFFICIENCY ITEMS
Widar Henriksson
EM No 18. STUDY SUCCESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION. A comparison of students admitted on the basis of GPA and SweSAT-scores with and without credits for work experience
Widar Henriksson, Simon Wolming
EM No 9. NOTES FROM THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SweSAT CONFERENCE. May 23-25, 1993
Ingemar Wedman, Christina Stage
EM No 10. NOTES FROM THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SweSAT CONFERENCE. New Orleans, April 2, 1994
Widar Henriksson, Sten Henrysson, Christina Stage, Ingemar Wedman and Anita Wester
EM No 11. USE OF ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES IN SELECTING CANDIDATES FOR SECONDARY AND TERTIARY EDUCATION: A COMPARISON
Christina Stage
EM No 12. GENDER DIFFERENCES IN TESTING. DIF analyses using the Mantel-Haenszel technique on three subtests in the Swedish SAT
Anita Wester
EM No 1. SELECTION TO HIGHER EDUCATION IN SWEDEN
Ingemar Wedman
EM No 2. PREDICTION OF ACADEMIC SUCCESS IN A PERSPECTIVE OF CRITERION-RELATED AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY
Widar Henriksson, Ingemar Wedman
EM No 3. ITEM BIAS WITH RESPECT TO GENDER INTERPRETED IN THE LIGHT OF PROBLEM-SOLVING STRATEGIES
Anita Wester
EM No 4. AVERAGE SCHOOL MARKS AND RESULTS ON THE SWESAT
Christina Stage
EM No 5. THE PROBLEM OF REPEATED TEST TAKING AND THE SweSAT
Widar Henriksson
EM No 6. COACHING FOR COMPLEX ITEM FORMATS IN THE SweSAT
Widar Henriksson
EM No 7. GENDER DIFFERENCES ON THE SweSAT. A Review of Studies since 1975
Christina Stage
EM No 8. EFFECTS OF REPEATED TEST TAKING ON THE SWEDISH SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST (SweSAT)
Widar Henriksson, Ingemar Wedman